What is shadow-banning?
First off, if you don't believe shadowing-banning is real, I don't blame you, because I didn't think it was real either until it happened to me personally and I was able to collect tons of evidence that clearly conveys it's real and is being utilized. Secondly, shadow-banning is just one method of countless attacks against this book; instead of taking the time to list all the manipulation and attack methods used against this book, it's easier and factual just to say that every single possible manipulation and attack that is possible has been used against this book. Everything you can possibly think of and countless other ways you can't possibly think of—because you're not privy to how online platforms work—have been used to silence the nonfictional information in this book. Since the average person doesn't know what manipulations and attacks could be used, I'll list just a few examples below to give you an idea. I can't list them all, because it would be a never-ending job and I wouldn't have any time to produce any new books to serve humanity in consciousness expansion.
What is shadow-banning and how is it different from a normal ban? How is it effective?
A normal ban of a book gives that book free marketing, as there are many people who want to read banned books just to see why they've been banned. To avoid the free marketing and exposure of banning a book, shadow-banning is an online method that simply keeps the book from being seen by people, so they don't even know it exists. Since it's all digital and online, it is easy to enact. The targeted book is removed from the new books section, it might not be listed in the genre sections it's tagged under, and it isn't recommended under other books that users have liked or purchased—all the ways in which a person finds out about new books. This last part is the most important, as that's how most books are discovered if they aren't published by one of the behemoth publishing houses. The only way to bring up the shadow-banned book, is to type the title of the book or the author into the search field on Google, Amazon, or Goodreads, and of course a person wouldn't do that if they didn't know the book existed in the first place. Shadow-banning is so effective that 99% of the authors being shadow-banned aren't aware of it and just think no one is interested in their book. If it's an unknown author, they're gaslighted and don't produce the capital to continue writing meaningful books, so they instead go to work at some dead-end, meaningless job. In this way, the globalists win again at censoring information and ensuring the source of that information stops attempting to go against their agendas or revealing their dirty secrets.
Why would a book be shadow-banned?
Information is power. In the digital world we live in, data and information is everything. I was aware of shadow-banning in the form of algorithm manipulation on YouTube for quite a while, but I naively didn't think the literary world was being suppressed. Besides videos, literature is the most powerful method for disseminating ideas and revelations to the public, so if anything is going to be censored, it's literature. Publishing houses weren't controlled—not tightly anyway—but now that almost all books are discovered and purchased online (Amazon being the biggest platform no doubt), it's easy to censor information by simply pressing a few buttons. A few buttons are pressed and the Kindle book acts like kindling as it's burned digitally, not needing to be banned and drawn attention to and burned physically anymore. (Kindle or Kindling: Materials, easily lighted, for starting a fire, such as small twigs or paper.) There is a reason why the label Kindle was selected instead of just e-book for digital books. Regardless of what you believe, at this point most people are aware that Amazon is a highly unscrupulous company. They have been brought to court several times for various reasons, none of them being for shadow-banning unfortunately. Those that are more in the know are aware that Amazon is just another huge conglomerate under the management of Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street (The Big 3) that have nearly US$11 trillion in assets under management, which is more than all sovereign wealth funds combined and over three times the global hedge fund industry. These Big 3 are the most powerful tools of the globalists to ensure power and control. If they want information to be censored, it is. With AI scanning every word in a book while it's being uploaded onto Amazon—or onto their other passively controlled online companies that sell books, which is all of them—books can be flagged without a single human on the job. If enough words and phrases are flagged, a human—who works in an undisclosed department, not just a basic Amazon worker—is tasked to look into the book and decide if shadow-banning—as well as other actions—need to be taken. Other actions include shills, which are people who are paid to use their created accounts on a platform like Goodreads to attack a book with horrible reviews and ratings from the onset before any other reviews are out there, which discourages all new potential readers and is meant to gaslight the author. The most popular method of the shill review is to not only give a book a bad review, but to label it with one of those words or phrases that has been conditioned into the population to produce a hating triggering effect: sexist, racist, misogynistic, and even culture appropriation (if you're deeply programmed). The first three work the best because females read a lot more than males and effectively control reading platforms like Goodreads. Keep in mind that in 2013 Amazon bought Goodreads for about $150 million in order to secure a monopoly in the literary world—books are bought on Amazon and they are rated and critiqued on Amazon and Goodreads. The Big 3 manage Amazon and Goodreads, with layers of personnel in between, of course, and the globalists manage the Big 3, again with layers of personnel (minions) in between. They can censor whatever they want on their platforms, ensuring continued obedience and control. I'm not going to take any time trying to convince anyone that doesn't believe they exist: the globalists/elites/whatever you want to call the mostly cohesive groups of people and bloodline families that manipulate, engineer, and control the planet for the most part. The evidence is all online (it's also right in front of your face every time you set a foot outside), so go research it for yourself if you're interested, or keep your head stuck under the sand, it's your choice. You have been given free will to do whatever suits you. Nothing should be forced.
A bullet point summary of the shadow-banning and paid attacks against The Beasts of Success.
Before I retyped this page on shadow-banning, I had a huge rant and pasted heaps of evidence and typed long-winded explanations as to what was being done against the book and myself. Tons of actions were done to my book and me, online and offline, so there was heaps of evidence to display on this page and took a long time to explain properly. It was so long that I don't think many people took the time to read and look at it all. I decided to delete it all from this page and instead produce a page of considerably less writing that doesn't scare people away once they see how time consuming dissecting the page would be. I know without a doubt that the book is being shadow-banned and that other efforts have been directed against the book and myself, and I've come to terms with accepting if people don't believe it. I know it's true and that's good enough for me. I don't need outside validation when I'm literally swimming in evidence. I'm no longer going to waste any time trying to convince people. You either believe it or you don't. It's been shown that someone can produce heaps of evidence and facts on a certain topic, but if a person is not willing to have an open mind, it's all for nothing, a waste of time; no amount of evidence or facts, no matter how revealing and damning, will persuade said person. So instead I will list a brief summary of only some of the manipulation below and be done with it so I can give my full attention back to writing more books to humbly help assist in raising the level of consciousness of humanity. And yes, this can be done using dark humor.
• 1. The first two shills that thwarted NetGalley traffic and attempted to gaslight me via e-mail
This killed all the readers who were interesting in my book, went to Goodreads, saw only the shill review and left.
A person e-mailed me and wanted me to add my book on Goodreads. My book wasn't on Goodreads because I'm not on Goodreads (and still don't have an account there but my book is now listed there). The person (who later I found out was a shill) couldn't get paid to do their job so they e-mailed me, telling me they got an ARC (advanced reading copy) from NetGalley, finished reading my book and loved it, and wanted to review it. They said I should put it on Goodreads so they could review it. I thanked them for their interest and told them I'm not on Goodreads and don't wish to join it, but they could add the book and review it if they wished. That was the only e-mail I got from this shill (that I didn't know was a shill at the time). Later on my book was added to Goodreads by that shill, or they got someone else to do it—I don't know how that works because I'm not on Goodreads. Later on while looking something up about my book on a Google search, I saw a result from Goodreads, so I clicked on it to check it out. My book had been added to Goodreads (without the genres listed on it that all other books on Goodreads have, I was told by someone later on) and there was only one review for The Beasts of Success. It was the same name of the person (shill) who had e-mailed me. Despite how the shill said they loved my book, they gave it 1 star and a review with the socially conditioned labels (sexism, appropriating culture) that would scare potential readers away, even though the novel doesn't contain those things. They then used their other shill accounts on Goodreads, or other real accounts they had befriended, to give their review 51 likes, ensuring that if anyone else reviewed my book afterwards that it would be listed below the horrible review that everyone seemed to support. Well, there was no further reviews because every person who found out about my book on NetGalley, read the synopsis and was interested, went to Goodreads to check it out, and saw only the 1 star review that had 51 likes, so they decided not to read the book. The shill had done their job: arriving first on the scene and scaring away all potential readers. Who e-mails an author saying they loved their book and telling them to put it on Goodreads only to lambaste it with a 1-star review? Only a shill would do that. Around the same time period, some other shill e-mailed me, attempting to be my friend with a long-winded message. We had a back and forth for about two or three e-mails. I won't get into the messages, but again, something was off. This person had no reason to e-mail me and was trying to be my friend even though they hadn't read my book or reviewed it, and all they were talking about was the book and matters pertaining to the book. For all I know it could've been the same shill just using a different e-mail account and a different name. The messages felt unnatural and I later realized it was a shill attempting to befriend me and manipulate issues about my book and affect me psychologically.
• 2. Complete shadow-banning on Amazon's Kindle Unlimited/KDP Select
This made my book invisible for the first 3 months it was out, the most crucial time period for a book's release.
In the first three months the novel was out, it was easy and quick to check and recognize by anyone in the Kindle Unlimited plan that the novel was being shadow-banned, or that there was an online error at least, because the book should've been displayed in the literary drama section of KDP Select e-books, which was only eight pages at the time (April of 2020), so it only took less than a minute and eight clicks of the mouse to see that The Beasts of Success was not displayed on any of the eight pages. The book wasn't shown in any genre category period; it was completely invisible within Kindle Unlimited. I knew something was wrong after not even a single page had been registered as read in a month. (Amazon has a tool that allows authors to see how many pages have been read while a book is in the Kindle Unlimited plan, which is a deal with Amazon where the author's book can only be read exclusively on Amazon's Kindle Unlimited plan for 90 days.) The book was free to read in the Kindle Unlimited plan so even if the book was so bad that no one liked it, they would've at least read one page before putting it down. But no, all I saw was a constant 0 pages read, while other books on Kindle Unlimited—and there weren't that many at the time—that were pretty bad were getting read entirely and reviewed; maybe bad reviews, but they had read pages and reviews none the less. It was 100% obvious something was wrong. At first I thought it was an online error because I still didn't believe in shadow-banning at the time, and even if I had, why would they shadow-ban a debut, unknown author? Well, it wasn't a technical error, as I had called and e-mailed Amazon countless times to fix the issue, and they said everything was fine on their end every time. I have no doubt that normal Amazon employees looked at it and didn't see an issue, as it's made to look like there isn't a problem on their end. There is obviously a separate group that's being utilized to shadow-ban and for it not to be seen by Amazon employees. Otherwise, the employee would see the problem and fix it. And of course you can't tell a normal Amazon worker to be complicit in a crime, so they don't know anything about it and think there's nothing wrong. They think there's something wrong with you, and they can't do anything to fix it no matter how many times you call them. You just look like a crazy author, an author who must have wrote a very, very, very bad book that no one wants to read even one page of, haha.
• 3. Google completely shadow-banned my author's website
Google is just another globalist-controlled company like Amazon. I created this author website about a month before my book was released. For almost a whole year (11 months to be exact), whenever I put "The Beasts of Success" in the search field, my website wasn't shown. I went out to the 300th listed result, still no sign of it. It was completely erased, invisible. When I figured out a way to prove this to people by using DuckDuckGo's search engine on February 3, 2021, where this author website was listed 2nd in the results when typing the book's title in the search engine, I told some of my friends and posted the evidence here on this website so everyone could see for themselves and know my book was being shadow-banned. My friends easily saw that this website was shadow-banned on Google and were amazed, as they didn't believe me (no surprise). To the surprise of us all, the very next day, Google removed the shadow-banning of this website in order to remove the proof, evidence of their manipulation, and make me look like a liar a the same time. I was surprised how quickly they did it, as if they had someone assigned to keep a close eye on all the changes I made on this website, or it was AI—something. It's astronomically impossible for my website not to exist on Google for 11 months, and then all of a sudden show up as the 4th result on Google the day after I posted the evidence on my website. It doesn't get any more red flaggy than that. Oh, but it gets even more red flaggy.
• 4. Further Amazon off & on shadow-banning
When most people find out about a book and want to check it out and/or buy it, they go to Amazon. They type the title of the book in the search field on the first page of Amazon where the search field is set to search ALL, everything on their site. The book searcher doesn't need to go to the book section because every book can be found using the ALL search field. My book was not shown at all searching this way, it was like Google all over again; no matter how far I scrolled down, nothing. It was like this for about two years. When somebody I knew wanted to buy the book, I told them over the phone that they'd have to either type the title and the author name in the ALL search section to find my book or search for it in the book section, otherwise it wouldn't come up. I talked to them about how it was one of the many shadow-banning methods and I went on about all the other stuff talked about above. Low and behold, the next day I checked it out again on Amazon—put the title in the ALL search field—and that one specific shadow-banning aspect had been removed: my book showed up when the title was typed in the ALL search field. It's safe to say I became paranoid after that because someone would've had to be listening to my phone call, or AI had been used to surveillance me, because just like Google—even more so because this was 2 years, not 11 months—that one specific shadow-banned aspect had been removed the very day after I had told that person about it. I hadn't even posted about it on this website and never called Amazon to tell them, as I had been there before with talking to Amazon employees over the phone and I knew they couldn't do anything about it, let only even see the error in the first place. I also probably was labeled a crazy author on their file because I had called them so many times already. Again, it's astronomically impossible to be not shown for 2 whole years and then change to working fine the very day after I talked to someone on the phone about it. After that, it seems to change back and forth—it's not shown for many months, and then it is shown and working fine on Amazon, over and over again. I just stopped checking it because it changes so many times.
• 5. City Book Review reviewed my novel without me asking or paying for it
First off, even though City Book Review—and many more online companies like it—is a waste of money and will do nothing to help market your book, I'm not holding them accountable, as I'm sure it was a paid individual at City Book Review acting on their own, or it wasn't even a person at City Book Review, but an e-mail that was made to look like it was from them. So out of the blue, City Book Review (or as I stated, maybe an imposter) e-mailed me and asked if I wanted to pay for a book review. I didn't think this odd because my e-mail is listed on this author website. (Although later I found out that City Book Review doesn't contact people like this; they only deal with people who contact them.) I politely declined. Weeks later, they e-mail me back with a review anyway. A review that I didn't ask for and didn't pay for. This struck me as very red flaggish because companies don't work for free; they don't give services without being paid. Needless to say, I thought I'd read their review that I hadn't asked or paid for. The review consisted of two large paragraphs, the first praising me for not having any grammatical or spelling errors, and the second paragraph lambasting the book with all the cliché literary critiquing phrases and terms. Double red flag, as why on earth would a review praise a book for grammatical and spelling issues when a book should automatically be free of those errors anyway, as that's the editor and proofreader's job before the book gets published. I knew something was very off: my book didn't contain all the cliché literary critiquing problems they listed, so my book must have many spelling and/or grammatical errors they don't want me to know about so I won't correct them. Black was white, and white was black with this review. I read my book again, which I had no problem doing because I can read The Beasts of Success over and over again and never get tired of it, laughing out loud all the time. I specifically focused on finding grammatical and spelling errors. A friend of mine, who loved the book enough to read it a second time within a six-month period, told me he'd tell me if he spotted any errors as well. Together we found a whopping 53 grammatical or spelling errors. I was embarrassed. The proofreader had done a very poor job. Of course I corrected all these errors, but this let me know without a doubt that the book review that was supposedly from City Book Review was indeed completely fake and designed to stop me from correcting the many errors; errors I wouldn't have even known about had they not given me their fake review. So in a way, I guess I have to thank this shill. They should've paid a smarter shill, as this was the dumbest deep-fake review ever. But I'm sure even this idiotic method works for 99% of the authors they're trying to manipulate, because if you don't know or believe in shadow-banning, it isn't ever an option you'd think of, so they'd think the review must be real in their minds. Luckily at this point—after the first four bullet point references, and more occurrences I didn't bother to cover on this page—I had already surmised that my book was being shadow-banned and attacked, and psychological attempts were being made to gaslight me. There were many more shady acts perpetrated, and more being continually added, but it would take too much time to cover them all, so I've decided to leave it with these 5 main cases.
• 6. Goodreads (owned by Amazon) many and major shadow-banning actions
In November of 2024, I received a wealth of data that shows without a doubt the mass shadow-banning actions used on Goodreads against The Beasts of Success from an individual who created software that uses simple spider-capturing online data to prove a book is being shadow-banned. I'm fortunate that this individual sent me this wealth of data because I'm not on Goodreads and so would never have known about it, and after seeing the astounding wealth of data of fraudulence on Goodreads, I have no plans to ever use Goodreads to find new books to read. This data and evidence gifted to me doesn't surprise me one bit, because The Beasts of Success has been shown to be shadow-banned and manipulated against in every possible shape and form everywhere, so it would have actually been a surprise to learn that Goodreads wasn't doing the same. Rather, just like on Amazon, it's not the employees at Goodreads who are doing this or even privy to it (unless they're being paid off clandestinely to do so), it's some separate department outside of Goodreads that has full access to Goodreads' website's code. The proof sent to me, which includes data, screenshots, and videos, abundantly illustrates these shadow-banning activities: the absence of The Beasts of Success being recommended under other books that share connected high ratings (which is probably the number one way readers find out about new books that are similar to the books they like on Goodreads) and the absence of most of the quotes from the book showing up (unless they're accessed directly from the book's page, of course). Both of these shadow-banning methods were proven to be in effect since the book was published in April of 2020 until 2024. These two shadow-banning manipulations only stopped in 2024 because this individual who created the shadow-banning software was using The Beasts of Success on his software as an example of a shadow-banned book because so far it's the only book they have found that is being shadow-banned, so without The Beasts of Success their software wouldn't have any captured manipulation to make the software relevant or prove that books are being shadow-banned period. Since so many people saw firsthand demonstrations of The Beasts of Success being shadow-banned on this software, they told other people and talked about it on Goodreads enough that it was being used as marketing for the book, so these two shadow-banning actions were stopped by the perpetrators in order to stop this marketing trend. After all, the shadow-banning methods were put into effect to silence the book, not market it and make it more well known. The shadow-banning itself is suppose to be the exact opposite of marketing (making the book non-existent), so when the proof of the shadow-banning became enough of a marketing factor in making people aware of the book, they stopped these two shadow-banning actions, of course. They aren't dumb after all, they're very crafty and deceptively smart. There are other manipulations on Goodreads the software creator believes are being implemented, but his software can't 100% prove it, so it's not certain that it's happening. These are: throttling of the book being seen and mentioned on people's feed (just like Facebook has been doing for years), The Beasts of Success being absent from the 5-star rated eleven books that are automatically shown on a person's favorite list on their profile page (unless a person doesn't have at least twelve 5-star rated books), and most positive reviews being deleted. The software creator said this last one has been pointed out by readers on Goodreads. It makes sense as a tactic because there are many people who simply won't read a book unless it has such-and-such amount of reviews, because they aren't free-thinkers and allow the majority (in this case the fake majority) of people to make up their mind for them. This is a tactic that the controlling people on this planet have used across the board for a long time to keep people away from certain information and cattle them toward information that supports their agendas. They do it because it's very effective. Since these individuals don't care about ethics or morals, they have no problem utilizing deceptive methods if they work very effectively. Why wouldn't they use them? The creator of the software said they were bummed out when the two major shadow-banning methods on Goodreads had been removed because it made their software less enticing, but they were sure that I'd be happy to know they have been removed, at least these two specific shadow-banning methods. It has been shown time and time again across all platforms and search engines that if a particular shadow-banning method within the all-encompassing manipulation is proven and communicated to other people, only then do they stop and remove that particular shadow-banning method in order to remove evidence and not help to prove the truth: that this book is being silenced on a grand scale. If it isn't known and isn't being proven, there is no reason for them to stop a particular shadow-banning method, so I know there are many more methods still in effect and always will be for The Beasts of Success.
• 7. Weebly (Square owned), the website-creating platform I use for this author's webpage, has been blocking my log ins and manipulating my stats for years.
The first time this happened was around January of 2025. I tried to log on to Weebly to edit this website. It stated that I had the wrong username or password. I though it was a glitch and would resolve itself in a week or two. It never did and I called up Weebly about it. They said it should be working fine, as it works fine on their end. They ran through all the basic tech possible issues that I'm very aware of—they always think they're talking to someone who knows nothing about computers because typically these kind of issues only happen to those type of people. I'm tech savvy enough to know what I'm doing. Trust me, the error isn't coming from my end. I've logged in the same way for years and haven't changed any settings or anything else. I have no problem signing into anything else online, only Weebly to access this author webpage. I tried logging on with a different computer and I logged in just fine, but I still can't log on using the original computer. As if this isn't a red flag by itself, the second computer I logged into started doing the same thing (again, with no settings on the computer being changed), so I had to log into a third computer to write this paragraph. I wouldn't be surprised if I won't be able to log into Weebly using this computer next time. I might have to log in using a different computer every time I edit this webpage. Good thing I don't edit this website that much anymore. This is obviously an attack. Weebly has been manipulating my page view data ever since I created this website (yet another attack I haven't spoken about). I have evidence that shows for a fact that they've been doing this. Weebly is owned by Square. Square was created by Jack Dorsey, who also created the original Twitter and has been associated with other dark-forces-operating online platforms. He has been used as a CEO puppet and worked under other capacities for the dark forces in enacting their agendas. Since I expose the dark forces in The Beasts of Success, they have spent a lot of money to silence this book and me. There isn't a method they haven't used. Again, I've only listed a few manipulation and attack methods on this page for example's sake. If I were to list and explain everything they've done and every new thing they come up with, the list would be never ending and I wouldn't have any time to write books, literarily.
• 8. Not just online manipulations and attacks, but actors, vandals, poisoners, & others hired to cease me
Okay, I'm not going to get into these accounts, which I have been shocked every time they've happened because I didn't think I was that big of a threat. There attacks have shown just how important my information is; it has been a major validation for myself. I also realize that even mentioning these attacks probably makes people less likely to believe anything on this page, but I decided to list ALL the things that I know have happened regardless of how it looks or sounds. I can't talk about these accounts on my website because it wouldn't be smart of me to show my cards to opposing players, the attackers. In order to protect myself in the future, I can't get into the details of these accounts that have happened in real life, not online. It's hard enough for people to believe even 1-6 bullet points, so why would they believe these accounts perpetrated in the physical world. I'd be giving up my future protection for no real gain. I don't even tell my friends and family about these accounts because I don't want them thinking I've gone mental, or be worried for me if they did believe. I've only told a few friends who like me are aware of the real world behind the façade and all the malevolent aspects being implemented on this planet. Don't worry about me, though, I have spiritual protection and guidance. It's not full proof, but it's worked so far for the most part.
Before I retyped this page on shadow-banning, I had a huge rant and pasted heaps of evidence and typed long-winded explanations as to what was being done against the book and myself. Tons of actions were done to my book and me, online and offline, so there was heaps of evidence to display on this page and took a long time to explain properly. It was so long that I don't think many people took the time to read and look at it all. I decided to delete it all from this page and instead produce a page of considerably less writing that doesn't scare people away once they see how time consuming dissecting the page would be. I know without a doubt that the book is being shadow-banned and that other efforts have been directed against the book and myself, and I've come to terms with accepting if people don't believe it. I know it's true and that's good enough for me. I don't need outside validation when I'm literally swimming in evidence. I'm no longer going to waste any time trying to convince people. You either believe it or you don't. It's been shown that someone can produce heaps of evidence and facts on a certain topic, but if a person is not willing to have an open mind, it's all for nothing, a waste of time; no amount of evidence or facts, no matter how revealing and damning, will persuade said person. So instead I will list a brief summary of only some of the manipulation below and be done with it so I can give my full attention back to writing more books to humbly help assist in raising the level of consciousness of humanity. And yes, this can be done using dark humor.
• 1. The first two shills that thwarted NetGalley traffic and attempted to gaslight me via e-mail
This killed all the readers who were interesting in my book, went to Goodreads, saw only the shill review and left.
A person e-mailed me and wanted me to add my book on Goodreads. My book wasn't on Goodreads because I'm not on Goodreads (and still don't have an account there but my book is now listed there). The person (who later I found out was a shill) couldn't get paid to do their job so they e-mailed me, telling me they got an ARC (advanced reading copy) from NetGalley, finished reading my book and loved it, and wanted to review it. They said I should put it on Goodreads so they could review it. I thanked them for their interest and told them I'm not on Goodreads and don't wish to join it, but they could add the book and review it if they wished. That was the only e-mail I got from this shill (that I didn't know was a shill at the time). Later on my book was added to Goodreads by that shill, or they got someone else to do it—I don't know how that works because I'm not on Goodreads. Later on while looking something up about my book on a Google search, I saw a result from Goodreads, so I clicked on it to check it out. My book had been added to Goodreads (without the genres listed on it that all other books on Goodreads have, I was told by someone later on) and there was only one review for The Beasts of Success. It was the same name of the person (shill) who had e-mailed me. Despite how the shill said they loved my book, they gave it 1 star and a review with the socially conditioned labels (sexism, appropriating culture) that would scare potential readers away, even though the novel doesn't contain those things. They then used their other shill accounts on Goodreads, or other real accounts they had befriended, to give their review 51 likes, ensuring that if anyone else reviewed my book afterwards that it would be listed below the horrible review that everyone seemed to support. Well, there was no further reviews because every person who found out about my book on NetGalley, read the synopsis and was interested, went to Goodreads to check it out, and saw only the 1 star review that had 51 likes, so they decided not to read the book. The shill had done their job: arriving first on the scene and scaring away all potential readers. Who e-mails an author saying they loved their book and telling them to put it on Goodreads only to lambaste it with a 1-star review? Only a shill would do that. Around the same time period, some other shill e-mailed me, attempting to be my friend with a long-winded message. We had a back and forth for about two or three e-mails. I won't get into the messages, but again, something was off. This person had no reason to e-mail me and was trying to be my friend even though they hadn't read my book or reviewed it, and all they were talking about was the book and matters pertaining to the book. For all I know it could've been the same shill just using a different e-mail account and a different name. The messages felt unnatural and I later realized it was a shill attempting to befriend me and manipulate issues about my book and affect me psychologically.
• 2. Complete shadow-banning on Amazon's Kindle Unlimited/KDP Select
This made my book invisible for the first 3 months it was out, the most crucial time period for a book's release.
In the first three months the novel was out, it was easy and quick to check and recognize by anyone in the Kindle Unlimited plan that the novel was being shadow-banned, or that there was an online error at least, because the book should've been displayed in the literary drama section of KDP Select e-books, which was only eight pages at the time (April of 2020), so it only took less than a minute and eight clicks of the mouse to see that The Beasts of Success was not displayed on any of the eight pages. The book wasn't shown in any genre category period; it was completely invisible within Kindle Unlimited. I knew something was wrong after not even a single page had been registered as read in a month. (Amazon has a tool that allows authors to see how many pages have been read while a book is in the Kindle Unlimited plan, which is a deal with Amazon where the author's book can only be read exclusively on Amazon's Kindle Unlimited plan for 90 days.) The book was free to read in the Kindle Unlimited plan so even if the book was so bad that no one liked it, they would've at least read one page before putting it down. But no, all I saw was a constant 0 pages read, while other books on Kindle Unlimited—and there weren't that many at the time—that were pretty bad were getting read entirely and reviewed; maybe bad reviews, but they had read pages and reviews none the less. It was 100% obvious something was wrong. At first I thought it was an online error because I still didn't believe in shadow-banning at the time, and even if I had, why would they shadow-ban a debut, unknown author? Well, it wasn't a technical error, as I had called and e-mailed Amazon countless times to fix the issue, and they said everything was fine on their end every time. I have no doubt that normal Amazon employees looked at it and didn't see an issue, as it's made to look like there isn't a problem on their end. There is obviously a separate group that's being utilized to shadow-ban and for it not to be seen by Amazon employees. Otherwise, the employee would see the problem and fix it. And of course you can't tell a normal Amazon worker to be complicit in a crime, so they don't know anything about it and think there's nothing wrong. They think there's something wrong with you, and they can't do anything to fix it no matter how many times you call them. You just look like a crazy author, an author who must have wrote a very, very, very bad book that no one wants to read even one page of, haha.
• 3. Google completely shadow-banned my author's website
Google is just another globalist-controlled company like Amazon. I created this author website about a month before my book was released. For almost a whole year (11 months to be exact), whenever I put "The Beasts of Success" in the search field, my website wasn't shown. I went out to the 300th listed result, still no sign of it. It was completely erased, invisible. When I figured out a way to prove this to people by using DuckDuckGo's search engine on February 3, 2021, where this author website was listed 2nd in the results when typing the book's title in the search engine, I told some of my friends and posted the evidence here on this website so everyone could see for themselves and know my book was being shadow-banned. My friends easily saw that this website was shadow-banned on Google and were amazed, as they didn't believe me (no surprise). To the surprise of us all, the very next day, Google removed the shadow-banning of this website in order to remove the proof, evidence of their manipulation, and make me look like a liar a the same time. I was surprised how quickly they did it, as if they had someone assigned to keep a close eye on all the changes I made on this website, or it was AI—something. It's astronomically impossible for my website not to exist on Google for 11 months, and then all of a sudden show up as the 4th result on Google the day after I posted the evidence on my website. It doesn't get any more red flaggy than that. Oh, but it gets even more red flaggy.
• 4. Further Amazon off & on shadow-banning
When most people find out about a book and want to check it out and/or buy it, they go to Amazon. They type the title of the book in the search field on the first page of Amazon where the search field is set to search ALL, everything on their site. The book searcher doesn't need to go to the book section because every book can be found using the ALL search field. My book was not shown at all searching this way, it was like Google all over again; no matter how far I scrolled down, nothing. It was like this for about two years. When somebody I knew wanted to buy the book, I told them over the phone that they'd have to either type the title and the author name in the ALL search section to find my book or search for it in the book section, otherwise it wouldn't come up. I talked to them about how it was one of the many shadow-banning methods and I went on about all the other stuff talked about above. Low and behold, the next day I checked it out again on Amazon—put the title in the ALL search field—and that one specific shadow-banning aspect had been removed: my book showed up when the title was typed in the ALL search field. It's safe to say I became paranoid after that because someone would've had to be listening to my phone call, or AI had been used to surveillance me, because just like Google—even more so because this was 2 years, not 11 months—that one specific shadow-banned aspect had been removed the very day after I had told that person about it. I hadn't even posted about it on this website and never called Amazon to tell them, as I had been there before with talking to Amazon employees over the phone and I knew they couldn't do anything about it, let only even see the error in the first place. I also probably was labeled a crazy author on their file because I had called them so many times already. Again, it's astronomically impossible to be not shown for 2 whole years and then change to working fine the very day after I talked to someone on the phone about it. After that, it seems to change back and forth—it's not shown for many months, and then it is shown and working fine on Amazon, over and over again. I just stopped checking it because it changes so many times.
• 5. City Book Review reviewed my novel without me asking or paying for it
First off, even though City Book Review—and many more online companies like it—is a waste of money and will do nothing to help market your book, I'm not holding them accountable, as I'm sure it was a paid individual at City Book Review acting on their own, or it wasn't even a person at City Book Review, but an e-mail that was made to look like it was from them. So out of the blue, City Book Review (or as I stated, maybe an imposter) e-mailed me and asked if I wanted to pay for a book review. I didn't think this odd because my e-mail is listed on this author website. (Although later I found out that City Book Review doesn't contact people like this; they only deal with people who contact them.) I politely declined. Weeks later, they e-mail me back with a review anyway. A review that I didn't ask for and didn't pay for. This struck me as very red flaggish because companies don't work for free; they don't give services without being paid. Needless to say, I thought I'd read their review that I hadn't asked or paid for. The review consisted of two large paragraphs, the first praising me for not having any grammatical or spelling errors, and the second paragraph lambasting the book with all the cliché literary critiquing phrases and terms. Double red flag, as why on earth would a review praise a book for grammatical and spelling issues when a book should automatically be free of those errors anyway, as that's the editor and proofreader's job before the book gets published. I knew something was very off: my book didn't contain all the cliché literary critiquing problems they listed, so my book must have many spelling and/or grammatical errors they don't want me to know about so I won't correct them. Black was white, and white was black with this review. I read my book again, which I had no problem doing because I can read The Beasts of Success over and over again and never get tired of it, laughing out loud all the time. I specifically focused on finding grammatical and spelling errors. A friend of mine, who loved the book enough to read it a second time within a six-month period, told me he'd tell me if he spotted any errors as well. Together we found a whopping 53 grammatical or spelling errors. I was embarrassed. The proofreader had done a very poor job. Of course I corrected all these errors, but this let me know without a doubt that the book review that was supposedly from City Book Review was indeed completely fake and designed to stop me from correcting the many errors; errors I wouldn't have even known about had they not given me their fake review. So in a way, I guess I have to thank this shill. They should've paid a smarter shill, as this was the dumbest deep-fake review ever. But I'm sure even this idiotic method works for 99% of the authors they're trying to manipulate, because if you don't know or believe in shadow-banning, it isn't ever an option you'd think of, so they'd think the review must be real in their minds. Luckily at this point—after the first four bullet point references, and more occurrences I didn't bother to cover on this page—I had already surmised that my book was being shadow-banned and attacked, and psychological attempts were being made to gaslight me. There were many more shady acts perpetrated, and more being continually added, but it would take too much time to cover them all, so I've decided to leave it with these 5 main cases.
• 6. Goodreads (owned by Amazon) many and major shadow-banning actions
In November of 2024, I received a wealth of data that shows without a doubt the mass shadow-banning actions used on Goodreads against The Beasts of Success from an individual who created software that uses simple spider-capturing online data to prove a book is being shadow-banned. I'm fortunate that this individual sent me this wealth of data because I'm not on Goodreads and so would never have known about it, and after seeing the astounding wealth of data of fraudulence on Goodreads, I have no plans to ever use Goodreads to find new books to read. This data and evidence gifted to me doesn't surprise me one bit, because The Beasts of Success has been shown to be shadow-banned and manipulated against in every possible shape and form everywhere, so it would have actually been a surprise to learn that Goodreads wasn't doing the same. Rather, just like on Amazon, it's not the employees at Goodreads who are doing this or even privy to it (unless they're being paid off clandestinely to do so), it's some separate department outside of Goodreads that has full access to Goodreads' website's code. The proof sent to me, which includes data, screenshots, and videos, abundantly illustrates these shadow-banning activities: the absence of The Beasts of Success being recommended under other books that share connected high ratings (which is probably the number one way readers find out about new books that are similar to the books they like on Goodreads) and the absence of most of the quotes from the book showing up (unless they're accessed directly from the book's page, of course). Both of these shadow-banning methods were proven to be in effect since the book was published in April of 2020 until 2024. These two shadow-banning manipulations only stopped in 2024 because this individual who created the shadow-banning software was using The Beasts of Success on his software as an example of a shadow-banned book because so far it's the only book they have found that is being shadow-banned, so without The Beasts of Success their software wouldn't have any captured manipulation to make the software relevant or prove that books are being shadow-banned period. Since so many people saw firsthand demonstrations of The Beasts of Success being shadow-banned on this software, they told other people and talked about it on Goodreads enough that it was being used as marketing for the book, so these two shadow-banning actions were stopped by the perpetrators in order to stop this marketing trend. After all, the shadow-banning methods were put into effect to silence the book, not market it and make it more well known. The shadow-banning itself is suppose to be the exact opposite of marketing (making the book non-existent), so when the proof of the shadow-banning became enough of a marketing factor in making people aware of the book, they stopped these two shadow-banning actions, of course. They aren't dumb after all, they're very crafty and deceptively smart. There are other manipulations on Goodreads the software creator believes are being implemented, but his software can't 100% prove it, so it's not certain that it's happening. These are: throttling of the book being seen and mentioned on people's feed (just like Facebook has been doing for years), The Beasts of Success being absent from the 5-star rated eleven books that are automatically shown on a person's favorite list on their profile page (unless a person doesn't have at least twelve 5-star rated books), and most positive reviews being deleted. The software creator said this last one has been pointed out by readers on Goodreads. It makes sense as a tactic because there are many people who simply won't read a book unless it has such-and-such amount of reviews, because they aren't free-thinkers and allow the majority (in this case the fake majority) of people to make up their mind for them. This is a tactic that the controlling people on this planet have used across the board for a long time to keep people away from certain information and cattle them toward information that supports their agendas. They do it because it's very effective. Since these individuals don't care about ethics or morals, they have no problem utilizing deceptive methods if they work very effectively. Why wouldn't they use them? The creator of the software said they were bummed out when the two major shadow-banning methods on Goodreads had been removed because it made their software less enticing, but they were sure that I'd be happy to know they have been removed, at least these two specific shadow-banning methods. It has been shown time and time again across all platforms and search engines that if a particular shadow-banning method within the all-encompassing manipulation is proven and communicated to other people, only then do they stop and remove that particular shadow-banning method in order to remove evidence and not help to prove the truth: that this book is being silenced on a grand scale. If it isn't known and isn't being proven, there is no reason for them to stop a particular shadow-banning method, so I know there are many more methods still in effect and always will be for The Beasts of Success.
• 7. Weebly (Square owned), the website-creating platform I use for this author's webpage, has been blocking my log ins and manipulating my stats for years.
The first time this happened was around January of 2025. I tried to log on to Weebly to edit this website. It stated that I had the wrong username or password. I though it was a glitch and would resolve itself in a week or two. It never did and I called up Weebly about it. They said it should be working fine, as it works fine on their end. They ran through all the basic tech possible issues that I'm very aware of—they always think they're talking to someone who knows nothing about computers because typically these kind of issues only happen to those type of people. I'm tech savvy enough to know what I'm doing. Trust me, the error isn't coming from my end. I've logged in the same way for years and haven't changed any settings or anything else. I have no problem signing into anything else online, only Weebly to access this author webpage. I tried logging on with a different computer and I logged in just fine, but I still can't log on using the original computer. As if this isn't a red flag by itself, the second computer I logged into started doing the same thing (again, with no settings on the computer being changed), so I had to log into a third computer to write this paragraph. I wouldn't be surprised if I won't be able to log into Weebly using this computer next time. I might have to log in using a different computer every time I edit this webpage. Good thing I don't edit this website that much anymore. This is obviously an attack. Weebly has been manipulating my page view data ever since I created this website (yet another attack I haven't spoken about). I have evidence that shows for a fact that they've been doing this. Weebly is owned by Square. Square was created by Jack Dorsey, who also created the original Twitter and has been associated with other dark-forces-operating online platforms. He has been used as a CEO puppet and worked under other capacities for the dark forces in enacting their agendas. Since I expose the dark forces in The Beasts of Success, they have spent a lot of money to silence this book and me. There isn't a method they haven't used. Again, I've only listed a few manipulation and attack methods on this page for example's sake. If I were to list and explain everything they've done and every new thing they come up with, the list would be never ending and I wouldn't have any time to write books, literarily.
• 8. Not just online manipulations and attacks, but actors, vandals, poisoners, & others hired to cease me
Okay, I'm not going to get into these accounts, which I have been shocked every time they've happened because I didn't think I was that big of a threat. There attacks have shown just how important my information is; it has been a major validation for myself. I also realize that even mentioning these attacks probably makes people less likely to believe anything on this page, but I decided to list ALL the things that I know have happened regardless of how it looks or sounds. I can't talk about these accounts on my website because it wouldn't be smart of me to show my cards to opposing players, the attackers. In order to protect myself in the future, I can't get into the details of these accounts that have happened in real life, not online. It's hard enough for people to believe even 1-6 bullet points, so why would they believe these accounts perpetrated in the physical world. I'd be giving up my future protection for no real gain. I don't even tell my friends and family about these accounts because I don't want them thinking I've gone mental, or be worried for me if they did believe. I've only told a few friends who like me are aware of the real world behind the façade and all the malevolent aspects being implemented on this planet. Don't worry about me, though, I have spiritual protection and guidance. It's not full proof, but it's worked so far for the most part.
|
There is no greater validation that conveys The Beasts of Success contains a plethora of important nonfictional information than how it has been viciously and thoroughly shadow-banned, manipulated, and attacked, as well as the attacks upon myself to silence me. These attacks and acts of manipulation serve as a better indirect review than any critic or reader could ever bestow upon the book in illustrating how well it was crafted and how powerful it is. The Beasts of Success is a multimillion best seller that has served humanity in expanding its awareness in all the timelines where it wasn't shadow-banned, silenced, manipulated against, and attacked. It will also reach this status and be as effective in this timeline, it will have just been delayed by six years. |
Note to all being shadow-banned, whistleblowers, or anyone trying hard to expose the globalists' agendas and/or are attempting to raise the global consciousness with wisdom, inventions, etc.:
They may come at you with everything they got and attempt to destroy your world, cut off your finances so you can't be effective, or even kill you, but if you give into their negativity, you've already done their job for them. Odds are you incarnated with the very mission you're performing. To give up that mission would be to mostly negate the reason for your incarnation in the first place, so stay vigilant no matter what. They will make it very hard for you to stay a loving and positive being, but if you become negative (angry, wallow in victimhood, etc.) from their manipulations, even if they're not successful in their physical actions, they will have won psychologically if they cause you to perpetually produce negative energy, cutting yourself off from your higher self that guides and protects you. And if your task is of a spiritual nature, like for myself, it will create blockages in your chakras and stop the energy flow up to your pineal and crown chakra, ceasing your ability to access information and wisdom from your higher-self and Source via the Ether. |
Some may ask why anyone would bother shadow-banning and attacking fictional books, since they're fictional. It's because fictional books are more powerful in reach than nonfictional books. Although nonfictional books can be very powerful and meaningful, they're directed at people who are already interested in the book's topic, naturally, so it's a preaching to the choir effect. Whereas fictional books have the potential of ending up in any person's hands. Also, fictional books relay information and don't tout that the information is the absolute truth, leaving the reader with the choice to believe it or not, which makes the material more likely to be received, or at least seed a person's consciousness, if not change their mental constructs altogether. If a person reads The Beasts of Success and still doesn't understand why it is being shadow-banned, they obviously thought most of the nonfictional parts of the book were fictional. This fictional book is heavily littered with nonfiction. You have been given so much more information than you realize.
How does The Beasts of Success help the situation? One must peel back the carpet to reveal the accumulated dirt and filth hidden under the carpet. Only then can we know it's there and deal with it by sweeping it away, cleaning and renewing our house, our world. But it won't be simple, as disturbed dirt will fly into the air for a period of time while it's being swept away, which makes the house appear dirtier than before, but it's only temporary and is necessary in order to truly clean the house and rid it of the hidden dirt that had been lurking about for so long. Unlike 1984, The Beasts of Success is riddled with satire and humor so the reader can enjoy such dark material instead of feeling like they've been punched in the gut repeatedly. It's a dark novel with shady characters because darkness is what needs to be revealed on this planet. There is no way to reveal this planet's truths without exposing darkness. Dark humor is the best medicine to be used to make such exposed darkness digestible, and even highly enjoyable to those who have a wide range of humor. Humor will keep your spirits up when you're faced with difficult and/or ugly matters in life. Humor is very therapeutic.
Despite all the efforts to make this book invisible, a trickling grassroots effort has allowed the information in this book to spread somewhat. This trickling appears to be growing slowly, but steadily. The information in this book is for everyone—a must read—but the fictional story may not be for everyone. I don't believe anyone should say a fictional book is a Must Read because that simply means they really liked it; their statement is based purely on their biases and preferences. You can say a nonfictional book is a must read because the information in it is very important to know. Since there is just as much or more important nonfictional information in The Beasts of Success, a fictional novel, I can still say it's a must read even though it's a fictional book. The fictional parts—even though readers have said they are highly entertaining and engrossing—are not a must read because it's fiction, but the nonfictional parts are so important that they are a must read. But which parts are fictional and nonfictional? ... Well, that's up for you to discern.